U.N. Official Says Darfur Continues to Crumble

March 21, 2009

U.N. Official Says Darfur Continues to Crumble
By NEIL MacFARQUHAR

UNITED NATIONS — The humanitarian situation in Darfur continues to deteriorate in the wake of Sudan’s decision to expel major foreign aid organizations from the country, a top United Nations official told the Security Council on Friday, with a majority of Council members sharply criticizing Khartoum for refusing to reverse its edict.

Critical areas of concern in Darfur include distribution of adequate food, water and medical care, as well as the safety of United Nations personnel and humanitarian workers who have been subject to stepped-up attacks, said the official, Rashid Khalikov, the director in New York for the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.

“Our ability to help the people of Darfur and northern Sudan has been seriously compromised,” he said. “The current atmosphere of fear and uncertainty facing all aid organizations is affecting the assistance available to the people of Darfur.”

Western ambassadors uniformly criticized Sudan for its decision to expel 13 foreign aid organizations and close three local ones, which the country did after the International Criminal Court in The Hague announced more than two weeks ago that it was indicting President Omar Hassan al-Bashir on war crimes charges.

Expressions of concern about the fate of about four million civilians in Darfur were universal from all 15 members of the Council. Even friends and neighbors of Sudan, like China, Uganda and Libya, which support a deferral of the court’s indictment, expressed concern about the impact of the expulsions.
Mr. Khalikov sketched a grim portrait of what was happening on the ground. Although the government expelled only 13 of scores of foreign agencies operating in Darfur, he said those provided about half of the distribution and provision of aid.

Over the past two weeks, one United Nations peacekeeper was killed and three were wounded in three separate attacks, he said. There have been meningitis outbreaks, as well. The expulsions ended a mass immunization campaign.
The United Nations is also troubled by the Sudanese government’s seizing assets from aid groups, Mr. Khalikov said.

Susan E. Rice, the American ambassador to the United Nations, delivered one of the most barbed speeches, holding Mr. Bashir responsible for the fate of all the people in Darfur. “President Bashir created this crisis,” she said. “He should rectify it immediately.”

She noted that the United States had donated about $4 billion in aid to Sudan and eastern Chad since 2004, including $1.25 billion in the current fiscal year, and that it would continue working with the United Nations and remaining agencies to deliver humanitarian assistance.

The two Sudanese representatives who spoke objected to the singling out of Mr. Bashir, saying that the expulsion was a government decision and that it was irreversible. One accused the West of creating a crisis over the aid groups in order to deflect attention from the real problem, which they said was the indictment.

The meeting on Friday was unexpected, prompted by the United States as a means to keep the spotlight on the crisis, diplomats said. Ms. Rice told reporters that the United States felt it was necessary because there had not been an open meeting on the subject in the two weeks since the expulsions.
The Security Council has failed to reach an agreement on what to do about the confrontation with Sudan, and no concrete proposals came out of the Friday meeting.

An even wider discussion is expected next week after John Holmes, under secretary general for humanitarian affairs and emergency relief coordinator at the United Nations, reports on a more thorough assessment of the aid situation being carried out in coordination with Sudan’s government.

The court’s chief prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, appeared at the microphones outside the Council chamber to suggest that the easiest solution to the problem was for Sudan itself to act.

“The Sudan has to find the way to arrest Bashir and stop the crimes; that is the best way,” he said.

Personal comment:

The region Darfur in the country Sudan in Africa has been a news item for a long time. The news about the terrible situation in the country seems to keep on coming. This article shows again that the population of Darfur experiences a difficult time.
Luckely there are a number of non profit organizations that want to take care of the people. However, it seems from this aritcle that the president of Sudan named: Bashir, is working against the foreign organisations that are providing health care.The outbreak of new diseases even worsens the situation.

At the end of the article it is stated that the people of Sudan should try to find a way to get rid of thier president, because the UN is not able to take care of Bashir. I feel that their should be a way for the UN/the world to take care of the people without having to pay attention to a president that is not acting in the best way for its nationals.

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/21/world/africa/21nations.html?pagewanted=print